BLM Leader BETRAYAL – The WHOLE Truth Is Finally Out

Two men shaking hands, one holding hidden knife.

A prominent Black Lives Matter activist who exploited the 2020 racial justice movement to steal over $1 million in taxpayer funds meant for struggling families is finally facing justice.

Story Snapshot

Monica Cannon-Grant, Boston BLM leader, pleading guilty to federal fraud charges involving over $1 million
Funds intended for low-income families and COVID-19 relief were diverted for personal use
Violence in Boston nonprofit exploited charitable donations during height of 2020 protests
Case exposes lack of oversight in activist-led organizations receiving public money

BLM Leader’s Web of Financial Deception

Monica Cannon-Grant, founder of the nonprofit Violence in Boston, built her reputation as a community advocate during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests following George Floyd’s death. Federal prosecutors revealed that between 2017 and 2021, Cannon-Grant and her late husband Clark Grant systematically diverted charitable donations and government grants intended for vulnerable Boston families. The couple faces charges including wire fraud, mail fraud, making false statements, and filing false tax returns.

The indictment details how the Grants exploited their nonprofit’s mission to address community violence while personally benefiting from funds designated for low-income assistance programs. Cannon-Grant’s October 2025 request for a change of plea hearing signals her intent to admit guilt after years of legal battles. Her husband died in a motorcycle crash in 2023, leaving Cannon-Grant to face the consequences alone.

COVID Relief Funds Misappropriated

Beyond traditional charitable fraud, the case encompasses the misuse of COVID-19 relief and rental assistance funds distributed during the pandemic’s economic crisis. These federal programs were designed as lifelines for families struggling with job losses and housing instability. Instead, prosecutors allege the Grants treated taxpayer money as their personal slush fund, demonstrating callous disregard for the communities they claimed to serve.

The timing of this fraud proves particularly egregious, occurring when American families faced unprecedented hardship during lockdowns and economic uncertainty. While legitimate nonprofits stretched resources to meet overwhelming demand for assistance, Violence in Boston allegedly diverted critical funds away from their intended recipients. This betrayal undermines public trust in charitable organizations and social safety net programs designed to help citizens during emergencies.

Pattern of Activist Organization Financial Misconduct

This case represents a troubling pattern within certain activist-led organizations that gained prominence during the 2020 protests. The combination of increased donations, reduced oversight, and political protection created opportunities for financial misconduct. Violence in Boston received significant funding precisely when public scrutiny of such organizations was considered politically incorrect, allowing questionable practices to continue unchecked.

The nonprofit sector’s lack of rigorous financial accountability measures enabled this fraud to persist for years. Traditional oversight mechanisms failed because Cannon-Grant’s activist status provided a shield against legitimate questions about fund management. This case demonstrates why taxpayers deserve transparent accounting of how their money flows through nonprofit organizations, regardless of their political affiliations or social justice missions.

Consequences for Vulnerable Communities

The real victims of this fraud are the low-income families who never received the assistance they desperately needed. Over $1 million in diverted funds represents thousands of missed opportunities to provide housing assistance, food security, and essential services to struggling Boston residents. The Violence in Boston nonprofit is now defunct, permanently eliminating services that could have genuinely helped the community it purported to serve.

This betrayal extends beyond immediate financial harm to long-term damage to legitimate charitable work. Donors become skeptical of contributing to community organizations, reducing resources available for authentic assistance programs. The case also provides ammunition for those seeking to reduce government funding for social programs, potentially harming future generations of families who genuinely need support.