Tattoo Scandal Erupts—Maine Candidate Under Fire

Metal label holder saying Secrets on wood background

A Democratic candidate’s past choices cast shadows on his Senate race as a Nazi tattoo controversy erupts.

Story Highlights

Graham Platner admits to covering up a Nazi-associated tattoo after public scrutiny.
The tattoo’s origins trace back to 2007 during his Marine Corps service.
Platner continues his campaign with support from Bernie Sanders despite calls to withdraw.
Controversy ignites debates on past actions and political accountability.

Tattoo Controversy Surfaces

Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate from Maine, finds himself embroiled in controversy after admitting to covering a tattoo resembling the Nazi SS “Totenkopf” symbol. The tattoo, obtained in 2007 while Platner was on leave in Croatia, has become a focal point in his campaign. Platner claims ignorance of the symbol’s Nazi association at the time, attributing the decision to a drunken impulse during his military service. The revelation came after a video surfaced, prompting Platner to cover the tattoo with a new design.

Platner’s admission has sparked significant backlash, especially given the symbol’s direct association with Nazi SS units, known for their role in concentration camps during the Holocaust. Critics argue that the gravity of the symbol’s historical meaning cannot be overlooked. Despite this, Platner remains committed to his campaign, emphasizing personal growth and accountability. His explanation, centering on ignorance and youth, contrasts sharply with the symbol’s notorious history.

Political Reactions and Media Scrutiny

The incident has polarized media coverage and public reaction, with some outlets highlighting perceived double standards in political responses. Supporters like Senator Bernie Sanders continue to endorse Platner, calling him a strong candidate. However, rivals such as Jordan Wood have called for his withdrawal, questioning the implications for the party’s integrity. The controversy underscores the delicate balance between personal history and public accountability in political campaigns.

Media outlets have varied in their coverage, with some accused of downplaying the controversy. This disparity highlights ongoing debates about media standards and the role of past actions in political viability. The incident also raises questions about the Democratic Party’s candidate vetting processes, particularly in high-stakes races like the Maine Senate election.

Impact on Campaign Dynamics

Platner’s campaign continues amid ongoing scrutiny, with the controversy central to the Democratic primary race. The situation has affected party unity and candidate vetting discussions, posing challenges for Platner’s electoral viability. While some voters may see Platner’s apologies and cover-up as sufficient, others remain skeptical of his explanations and the broader implications for political accountability.

Maine U.S. Senate Candidate Says He Covered Up Tattoo That Had Nazi Imagery https://t.co/XxxgrX4sXt

— The Bork Report (@BorkReport) October 22, 2025

As the campaign progresses, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in political figures’ histories. The debate continues to unfold, with implications for both the Democratic Party and broader political discourse. The controversy highlights the challenges candidates face in addressing past actions, particularly those with potential to undermine public trust and party integrity.