HORRIFYING Liverpool Parade Attack — Baby Flies

A rage-fueled vehicle attack at Liverpool’s victory parade left 29 innocent victims traumatized, including a six-month-old baby hurled 15 feet through the air—exposing how quickly celebratory family events can turn into scenes of terror when criminals target defenseless crowds.

Story Highlights

Paul Doyle admitted guilt for driving into 29 victims during Liverpool FC’s 2022 parade celebration
Six-month-old baby Teddy Eveson was thrown 15 feet in his pram but miraculously survived
Victims suffer ongoing PTSD, panic attacks, and suicidal thoughts from the traumatic attack
Ex-soldier bystanders intervened heroically to stop Doyle and assist the wounded

Criminal Admits Guilt After Years of Denial

Paul Doyle, 54, finally changed his plea to guilty at Liverpool Crown Court in December 2025, admitting to attempting to cause grievous bodily harm to 29 victims. The Croxteth resident had initially denied charges stemming from his May 2022 rampage through crowds celebrating Liverpool FC’s trophy parade. Court testimony revealed Doyle “flew into a rage” before deliberately driving his black BMW into families gathered on The Strand, continuing his assault for approximately two minutes.

Families Describe Lasting Trauma and Terror

Victim impact statements delivered during sentencing hearings painted a devastating picture of lives forever changed. The mother of baby Teddy Eveson told the court that “the sound of the car hitting people will live with me forever,” describing the horrific moment she watched her infant son’s pram launched 15 feet down the road. Another mother testified about constant flashbacks, insomnia, and visions of her 13-year-old son’s terrified face during the attack.

The psychological damage extends far beyond physical injuries, with multiple victims reporting post-traumatic stress disorder, panic attacks, and suicidal thoughts. These families attended what should have been a joyful community celebration, only to find themselves fighting for their lives when Doyle targeted the crowd. The deliberate nature of his actions—mounting the central reservation and continuing to drive through people over two minutes—demonstrates the calculated cruelty inflicted upon innocent citizens.

Heroes Emerge Amid the Chaos

Despite the terror Doyle unleashed, the attack also revealed the courage of ordinary citizens who refused to stand by while others suffered. An ex-soldier in the crowd was praised as a hero for helping to stop Doyle and providing immediate aid to victims. Other bystanders rushed to assist casualties and prevent further harm, embodying the community spirit and resilience that criminals like Doyle sought to destroy.

This incident exposes critical vulnerabilities in event security planning that put families at risk. While Liverpool FC’s parade drew hundreds of thousands of supporters to celebrate their domestic cup victories, inadequate vehicle barriers allowed Doyle to access areas where dense crowds of children and elderly people had gathered. The fact that 29 people ranging from six months to 77 years old were injured highlights how families trusted local authorities to provide safe environments for community celebrations.

Long-Term Impact on Public Safety and Trust

The Liverpool parade attack represents more than individual criminal behavior—it demonstrates how quickly public celebrations can become targets for violence when proper security measures fail. Event organizers nationwide must now reconsider hostile vehicle mitigation strategies, including physical barriers and controlled access zones that separate crowds from potential threats. The psychological toll on victims serves as a stark reminder that inadequate planning can destroy lives and shatter community trust in public safety.

Doyle’s guilty plea brings some measure of accountability, but it cannot undo the trauma inflicted on 29 innocent victims who simply wanted to celebrate their team’s success. The case reinforces that deliberate vehicle attacks against crowds constitute serious criminal offenses deserving substantial punishment, regardless of whether terrorism charges apply. As sentencing proceeds, the focus must remain on supporting victims’ recovery while ensuring such preventable attacks never happen again through improved security protocols.