Tim Walz’s Lackluster Performance Raises Big Concerns for Democrats

Tim Walz’s lackluster performance in the vice presidential debate against JD Vance raises concerns for the Democratic ticket.

At a Glance

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz appeared underprepared in the vice presidential debate against Ohio Senator JD Vance.
CNN anchors criticized Walz for allowing Vance to land unchallenged attacks.
Vance’s confident performance and smooth delivery made a positive impression.
Snap polls from CNN and CBS showed a virtual tie between the candidates.
The debate covered issues such as reproductive rights and Middle East tensions.

Walz’s Underwhelming Performance

In a surprising turn of events, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s performance in the October 1, 2024, vice presidential debate against Ohio Senator JD Vance left many observers questioning his readiness for the national stage. CNN anchors Abby Phillip and Dana Bash were among those who expressed disappointment in Walz’s showing, noting his apparent lack of preparation and inability to effectively counter Vance’s arguments.

Phillip’s critique was particularly pointed, stating, “Tim Walz did not seem prepared.” This assessment was echoed by other political analysts who observed that Walz struggled to articulate his points smoothly and often relied on prepared remarks rather than engaging directly with Vance’s statements.

Last night exposed the fact that Walz is not ready for Prime-Time.

There's a reason they don't do interviews.
There's a reason they don't talk policy.
There's a reason they hide their records.
There's a reason they only run on joy/vibes.

They have a problem.
And they will LOSE. pic.twitter.com/5L636TpNuR

— Byron Donalds (@ByronDonalds) October 2, 2024

Vance’s Strong Showing

In contrast to Walz’s struggles, JD Vance appeared poised and well-prepared throughout the debate. His calm demeanor and effective presentation, especially on international affairs, left a positive impression on many viewers. Vance’s ability to remain unflustered and deliver his message clearly gave him an edge in the eyes of some commentators.

“JD Vance came to land a bunch of punches and he did… Tim Walz didn’t seem prepared for it,” CNN anchor Abby Phillip said after the debate wrapped. “There was a clear lack of preparation and execution here on Walz’s part.”

CNN commentator David Urban went so far as to give Vance a perfect score, praising his performance as “10 out of 10.” This high praise underscores the effectiveness of Vance’s debate strategy and his ability to connect with the audience.

Key Issues and Missteps

The debate covered a range of critical issues, including reproductive rights and tensions in the Middle East. While Vance managed to navigate these topics smoothly, Walz faced some challenges. Notably, Walz admitted to misspeaking about being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre, a gaffe that did not go unnoticed by viewers and commentators.

“I’ve not been perfect and I’m a knucklehead at times,” Walz said, before adding that he sometimes “will talk a lot” and “get caught up in the rhetoric.”

This self-deprecating admission, while honest, may have further undermined confidence in Walz’s preparedness for the vice presidency. It also highlighted the contrast between his sometimes scattered approach and Vance’s more polished performance.

Implications for the Campaign

While snap polls from CNN and CBS showed a virtual tie between the candidates, the overall impression left by the debate could have implications for the broader presidential campaign. Democratic strategist David Axelrod noted that while Walz started weak, he finished strong. However, the initial stumbles may have already set the tone for many viewers.

The Trump campaign was quick to declare Vance the winner of the debate, while the Harris campaign praised Walz’s leadership and focus on real solutions. Despite these partisan assessments, the true impact on voters remains to be seen.

As the election season progresses, it will be crucial for both campaigns to assess the debate’s impact and adjust their strategies accordingly. With no further vice presidential debates scheduled, and uncertainty surrounding additional debates between Harris and Trump, this single encounter between Walz and Vance may prove to be a significant moment in the 2024 election narrative.